{"id":1108,"date":"2024-10-15T16:59:43","date_gmt":"2024-10-15T20:59:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/?post_type=product-resource&p=1108"},"modified":"2025-06-16T15:35:01","modified_gmt":"2025-06-16T19:35:01","slug":"an-overunity-formula","status":"publish","type":"product-resource","link":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/product-resource\/an-overunity-formula\/","title":{"rendered":"\u00bfUna f\u00f3rmula de rendimiento superior al 100 %?"},"content":{"rendered":"

I recently (November 2014) had an\u00a0interesting<\/strong>\u00a0(to me anyway)\u00a0thought<\/strong>\u00a0while contemplating the Water Powered Generator<\/em>\u00a0concept I notified my eNews subscribers about in our enews and a blog update on the old site.<\/p>\n

There may be a way to mathmatically \u2018prove\u2019 and optimize many over-unity and\/or free energy (OU FE) technologies with\u00a0a simple formula<\/a>\u00a0taught in high school physics class.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve noticed a common denominator of many of the OU FE technologies is speed or velocity.<\/p>\n

If we use the formula\u00a0KE = 1\/2M*V2<\/a><\/strong>,
\nKinetic Energy equals\u00a0one half Mass times Velocity Squared<\/a>;
\nwe find that velocity is vitally important to efficiently getting energy out of a system.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s take examples<\/strong>\u00a0of a weight of 10 lbs rising 1 foot and\u00a0a 1 lb weight rising 10 feet.
\nBoth have done 10 ft\/lbs of \u2018work\u2019.<\/p>\n

Now assume both happened in 1 second.<\/p>\n

The KE of the first would be (10\/2)*(1*1) = 5<\/p>\n

The KE of the second (lighter but faster weight) would be (1\/2)*(10*10) = 50<\/p>\n

The KE of the lighter faster weight is 10x more than the larger slower weight, even though the \u2018work\u2019 done was identical!<\/p>\n

Take oxidation as another example:<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0If iron oxidizes slowly, we call it rust and there is little way to extract energy from it. \u00a0If it oxidizes faster, we call it burning and it is hot enough for us to convert some of the heat energy to kinetic energy. \u00a0If it oxidizes even faster, we call it an explosion (mix with aluminum to make thermite) and conversion of potential chemical energies to kinetic energy is even more efficient.<\/p>\n

With gasoline, we average 3 BTU per combustion event in an internal combustion engine. \u00a0If we used 3 BTU of dynamite, the piston would be blown through the bottom of the engine. \u00a0The amount of thermal energy (3 BTU) is exactly the same. \u00a0The difference is the speed of combustion.
\nThis is why the Bourke Engine was\/is so efficient, it is designed to operate with fuel that detonates.
\nBTW, the safe way to dispose of old dynamite is to burn it in a fire; it doesn\u2019t explode when burned, it just burns like a log.<\/em><\/p>\n

So, my point is that<\/strong>, technologies using velocity as part of their energy conversion system make use of the part of the KE equation that is\u00a0velocity squared<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

You only consider\u00a01\/2 mass<\/strong>, and you\u00a0square velocity<\/strong>; so moving mass isn\u2019t as effective as increasing velocity.
\nAs the velocity increases, the KE increases\u00a0squared<\/strong>. \u00a0If you are looking for OU FE, (or even just high efficiency) you need to pay attention to velocity<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Back to the\u00a0so called<\/em>\u00a0Water Powered Generator. \u00a0While this generator isn\u2019t really water powered (no combustion of water), it does use water as the medium to convert pressure to velocity.
\nSo MAYBE\u2026\u00a0If the technology is valid<\/strong>,\u00a0or at least for this theory \/ concept to be valid<\/em>\u2026 We could work out the energy it takes to pump small amounts of water to high pressure compared to the energy we get back from releasing that pressurized water through a nozzle designed to convert pressure to the highest velocity possible, onto a device (like a Pelton Wheel) optimized to convert that velocity to Kenetic Energy\u2026<\/p>\n

Pressure \/ Mass conversion charts for Pelton Wheels are available online; so a person could quickly see how much KE you\u2019d get for any given pressure (say 200 psi) and mass (of water). \u00a0Then, find the data needed to figure out how much energy it\u2019d take for an efficient pump to pump that volume of water to that pressure.<\/p>\n

Comparing these two sets of data would tell you if it takes less energy to pump the water than you get from the output.
\nLogic says it won\u2019t be OU, because it should take just as much energy to pump to high pressure as you get back from releasing that pressure (plus resistance losses) but this line of thinking is the only one I currently see as a possible theory\u2026<\/p>\n

So, what are some other examples of OU FE technologies that use speed as part of their conversion of energies?<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve seen MANY different configurations of electromagnetic induction technologies, most of which require an extremely fast pulse or discharge to exhibit OU effects. \u00a0For examples research Edwin Gray, Joesph Newman and John Bedini.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve seen several capacitive discharge OU technologies.
\nLike\u00a0this YouTube video<\/a>,\u00a0this theory<\/a>\u00a0y\u00a0this schematic<\/a>.
\nMore research resources \/ examples:
\nCharging a capacitor without loss<\/a>
\nA motor circuit that works?<\/a>
\nCapacitive Discharge WaterGun<\/a>
\nCapacitive Discharge Motor<\/a>
\nCapacitive Water Explosion<\/a>\u00a0(to make water a fuel)<\/p>\n

BTW, I proved that capacitors are actually electromagnetic devices too (truely opposite of inductors), by putting a flat coil in between two plates and putting AC onto the plates; the coil output an AC voltage and current,\u00a0proving that there is an actual magnetic field between the plates of a capacitor<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Interesting new way to collect\u00a0energy from vibrations using parrallel plates<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Energy Conserver Theory:<\/strong>
\nNote that I (George Wiseman) have a personal theory that heat, light and magnetisum are side effects of electron flow and do not \u2018consume\u2019 electricity.
\nI believe that these \u2018loads\u2019 don\u2019t consume power, I think the way we currently design circuits cause power sources to neutralize themselves.
\nIf my theory is correct, a person should be able to design circuits that \u2018recycle\u2019 electricity; having electron flow in ways that do not allow the source to neutralize itself (or at least slow that effect down).
\nI describe this theory and show some experiments to prove it in my\u00a0Energy Conserver Book 1<\/a>\u00a0y\u00a0Energy Conserver Book 2<\/a>.
\nI designed a circuit similar to the Tesla Switch years before I knew Tesla\u2019d already done it.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For a practical (and free)\u00a0Guide to Free Energy<\/strong>\u00a0technologies,\u00a0go HERE<\/a>!<\/p>\n

For plans to build a\u00a0Free Energy Accumulator<\/strong>,\u00a0go HERE!<\/a><\/p>\n

For plans on how to build a\u00a0Free Energy Motor \/ Generator<\/strong>,\u00a0go HERE!<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

For another answer to \u201cIS FREE ENERGY REALLY POSSIBLE?\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n

Yes!<\/strong>\u00a0And thermodynamics has been extended since 1977 to include systems that output more than we have to input as long as they\u2019re open to other sources of potential energy from the environment.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Check out this simple article that gives a basic feel for this concept:<\/div>\n
http:\/\/emediapress.com\/2014\/11\/04\/is-free-energy-really-possible\/<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

Many conventionally trained academics deny the possibility that a machine can produce more work than we\u2019re required to supply on the input. As long as a system is open to the environment where more potential energy can enter the machine, then more work can be done than we had to pay for.<\/strong><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

The downfall to conventional academia is that the concepts of energy and potential energy are taught completely backwards\u00a0and there is no accounting for what the actual source potential for electrical charge even is or where it comes from.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Once the distinctions are straightened out, then we can see that not only is it possible to create a free energy machine, if we build them according to the natural principles of open systems, it is practically a requirement for them to output more than we have to input.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Closed system thermodynamics as taught in school only apply to closed heat systems, yet the entire field of physics, etc. try to apply it to electromagnetics, mechanical systems, you name it. The fact of the matter is that\u00a0conventional closed system thermodynamics actually do not even apply to any natural system in the Universe<\/em>\u00a0\u2013 because every natural system is open to other sources of potential energy!<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

We recommend reading a copy of\u00a0The Quantum Key<\/a><\/strong><\/em>\u00a0by Aaron Murakami as a basic primer that explains the reality of free energy systems in terms so simple, only a junior high school level understanding is needed.<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Quantum Key is actually a simplified Unified Field Theory for the layman that links gravity, inertial, electricity, mass, light speed, etc\u2026 all together in a seamless manner and even gives a simple explanation of what Time may actually be. Make sure to at least read the descriptions of the chapter on the website below!<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

This book is available at a hugely discounted price, which will change soon, so make\u00a0The Quantum Key<\/a><\/strong><\/em>\u00a0a part of your library \u2013 its a perfect companion to the\u00a0Bedini SG Trilogy<\/a>!<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
Another OU technology\u2026<\/strong>
\nJim Murray & Paul Babcock demonstrated the SERPS unit, which lit 50 watts of bulbs for a net draw of only 1 watt from the power supply. That is a COP of 50.0, which is 5000% more work done than the net draw from the transformer.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
First, watch the COP 20.0 video:
\nhttp:\/\/emediapress.com\/2014\/05\/05\/demonstration-of-2000-energy-gain\/<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Then, watch the short interview about the upscaled unit:
\nhttp:\/\/emediapress.com\/2014\/07\/09\/jim-murray-paul-babcock-serps-cop-50-0-5000-presentation\/<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

Get your own \u00a0FREE ENERGY BIBLE<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"product-resource-group":[126],"restricted-resource-tag":[],"class_list":["post-1108","product-resource","type-product-resource","status-publish","hentry","product-resource-group-browns-gas-pump-resources"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product-resource\/1108","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product-resource"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product-resource"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1108"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product-resource-group","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product-resource-group?post=1108"},{"taxonomy":"restricted-resource-tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aquacure-jeffro-dev.linksdev.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/restricted-resource-tag?post=1108"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}